Federal award
OAKLAND CONSULTING GROUP INC
0004
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $4,397,190.00
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $4,508,673.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- OAKLAND CONSULTING GROUP INC · W8LAHDYY4KQ3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- OAKLAND CONSULTING GROUP INC · W8LAHDYY4KQ3
- Awarding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 97AS · office SP4701
- Funding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 97AS
- Product or service (PSC)
- D307 · IT AND TELECOM- IT STRATEGY AND ARCHITECTURE
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541512 · COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES
- PIID
- 0004
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- SP470110A0016
- Award type code
- A
- Actions
- 13 · Mar 7, 2011 to Jul 30, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History13
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2013 | FY2013 | 14 | C | $117,929.00 | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | FY2013 | 12 | C | $507,876.00 | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | FY2013 | 11 | C | $161,939.00 | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FY2013 | 10 | C | $128,087.00 | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 9 | C | $304,968.00 | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | FY2012 | 7 | A | $786,817.00 | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | FY2012 | 6 | C | $718,474.00 | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | FY2011 | 4 | C | −$111,483.00 | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | FY2011 | 5 | A | $575,704.00 | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 3 | A | $242,115.00 | — |
| May 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 2 | A | $796,656.00 | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 1 | B | $110,528.00 | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FY2011 | 0 | — | $57,580.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.