Federal award
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE
0027
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,100,069.11
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $1,100,069.11
- Current value
- $1,100,069.11
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,118,766.83
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE · HB6KNGVNJRU1
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SYSTEM · TWJWHYEM8T63
- Awarding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100 · office W31P4Q
- Funding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- AD92 · R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: OTHER (APPLIED RESEARCH/EXPLORATORY DEVELOPMENT)
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541711 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
- PIID
- 0027
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W31P4Q09D0010
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 26 · Aug 14, 2009 to Feb 15, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History26
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2012 | FY2012 | 25 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | FY2012 | 24 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | FY2012 | 23 | C | −$18,697.72 | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | FY2011 | 22 | B | $22,705.92 | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FY2011 | 21 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | FY2011 | 20 | B | $97,141.92 | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | FY2011 | 19 | B | $17,733.73 | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | FY2011 | 17 | B | $68,979.80 | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | FY2011 | 18 | B | $62,604.00 | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | FY2011 | 16 | B | $269,290.40 | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 15 | B | $17,946.48 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | FY2011 | 14 | B | $56,267.99 | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FY2011 | 13 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | FY2011 | 12 | B | $76,656.00 | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | FY2010 | 11 | B | $21,474.90 | — |
| May 11, 2010 | FY2010 | 10 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | FY2010 | 9 | B | $50,167.03 | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | B | $24,704.00 | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | G | $59,149.52 | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | B | $20,775.69 | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | FY2010 | 5 | G | $17,168.40 | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | G | $18,027.60 | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | G | $129,963.85 | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | G | $56,010.22 | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $31,999.38 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.