Federal award
SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC.
F701
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $4,988,964.00
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $4,988,964.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC. · Z5G7R7QDAYD9
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC. · Z5G7R7QDAYD9
- Awarding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100 · office W91WAW
- Funding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- R408 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT
- Industry (NAICS)
- 561210 · FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES
- PIID
- F701
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W911SE07D0025
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Mar 25, 2009 to Sep 4, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2012 | FY2012 | 11 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 26, 2012 | FY2012 | 10 | G | $120,072.00 | — |
| May 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 9 | G | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | FY2012 | 8 | G | $611,716.00 | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | FY2012 | 7 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | FY2011 | 6 | C | $731,788.00 | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 5 | G | $731,788.00 | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | FY2010 | 3 | G | $1,416,969.60 | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | M | $676,630.40 | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $700,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.