Federal award
ENVISAGE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
HSBP1010F00586
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,819,439.89
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $3,820,272.28
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- ENVISAGE TECHNOLOGIES LLC · N8MAWLN45HN5
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- ENVISAGE TECHNOLOGIES LLC · N8MAWLN45HN5
- Awarding agency
- Department of Homeland Security · sub-agency 7014 · office AFTCD
- Funding agency
- Department of Homeland Security · sub-agency 7014
- Product or service (PSC)
- D308 · IT AND TELECOM- PROGRAMMING
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541512 · COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES
- PIID
- HSBP1010F00586
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- GS35F0058N
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 11 · Sep 29, 2010 to May 28, 2015
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2015 | FY2015 | P00010 | K | −$741.43 | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FY2013 | P00009 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | FY2013 | P00008 | G | $286,875.00 | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | FY2013 | P00007 | C | $39,871.02 | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | FY2012 | P00006 | A | $286,875.00 | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | FY2012 | P00005 | M | −$45.48 | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | FY2012 | P00004 | M | −$45.48 | — |
| May 30, 2012 | FY2012 | P00003 | D | $41,861.04 | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | FY2012 | P00002 | G | $496,250.00 | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | FY2011 | P00001 | G | $961,604.00 | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FY2010 | 0 | — | $1,706,936.22 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.