Federal award
FAIRFIELD TECHNOLOGIES INC
HSSS0111F0129
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,791,182.85
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $3,791,182.85
- Current value
- $3,791,182.85
- Gross positive obligations
- $3,910,269.47
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- FAIRFIELD TECHNOLOGIES INC · PLTEGDG1GMS5
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- FAIRFIELD TECHNOLOGIES INC · PLTEGDG1GMS5
- Awarding agency
- Department of Homeland Security · sub-agency 7009 · office 70US09
- Funding agency
- Department of Homeland Security · sub-agency 7009
- Product or service (PSC)
- D301 · IT AND TELECOM- FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541511 · CUSTOM COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES
- PIID
- HSSS0111F0129
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- GS35F0643W
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 11 · Jul 1, 2011 to Jun 21, 2017
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2017 | FY2017 | 10 | C | −$1,514.14 | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | FY2016 | 9 | G | $295,262.67 | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | FY2016 | 8 | G | $144,030.60 | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | FY2015 | 7 | F | −$117,572.48 | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | FY2015 | 6 | G | $752,481.11 | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | FY2014 | 5 | G | $723,539.53 | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | FY2013 | 4 | M | $154,650.00 | — |
| May 20, 2013 | FY2013 | 3 | G | $695,711.09 | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | FY2012 | 2 | G | $501,370.46 | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | FY2012 | 1 | C | $482,418.01 | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 0 | — | $160,806.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.