Federal award
AVIATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING COMPANY INC
0001
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $589,786.81
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $727,780.00
- Current value
- $727,780.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $680,664.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- AVIATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING COMPANY INC · TMUNF881XCH1
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- AVIATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING COMPANY INC · TMUNF881XCH1
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N00189
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R799 · SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: OTHER
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541690 · OTHER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0001
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N0018911DZ040
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Oct 21, 2011 to Jun 26, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013 | FY2013 | 11 | B | −$90,877.19 | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | FY2012 | 10 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | FY2012 | 9 | C | $175,664.00 | — |
| May 3, 2012 | FY2012 | 8 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | FY2012 | 7 | B | $300,000.00 | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | FY2012 | 6 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | FY2012 | 5 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | FY2012 | 4 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | FY2012 | 3 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | FY2012 | 2 | M | $155,000.00 | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | FY2012 | 1 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | FY2012 | 0 | — | $50,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.