Federal award
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP
0001
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $4,392,711.00
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $4,392,711.00
- Current value
- $4,392,711.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $4,392,711.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP · KNW6WWRKELJ3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP · KNW6WWRKELJ3
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S3915A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- AD25 · R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: SERVICES (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0001
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N6133109D0004
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Feb 5, 2009 to Jan 22, 2016
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | FY2016 | 1C | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | FY2010 | 10 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | FY2010 | 9 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | B | $653,476.00 | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | FY2010 | 6 | C | $590,000.00 | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | FY2010 | 5 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | C | $662,000.00 | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | B | $100,000.00 | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | C | $330,000.00 | — |
| May 4, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $2,057,235.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.