Federal award
GRANT THORNTON LLP
0001
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $13,460,203.81
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $14,713,355.41
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- GRANT THORNTON LLP · EKL9GHBN21A1
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- GRANT THORNTON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED · MNH8YKM7CK74
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W81XWH
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9760
- Product or service (PSC)
- D302 · IT AND TELECOM- SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541611 · ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0001
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W81XWH08D0027
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 13 · Apr 9, 2008 to Jun 13, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History13
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2013 | FY2013 | 12 | K | −$1,150,151.60 | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | FY2012 | 11 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 10 | B | −$103,000.00 | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | FY2011 | 9 | B | $828,775.20 | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | B | $1,284,601.56 | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | B | $621,581.40 | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | A | $1,863,877.25 | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | FY2009 | 5 | G | $450,764.00 | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | A | $901,528.00 | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | G | $4,013,223.00 | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FY2008 | 2 | G | $871,048.00 | — |
| May 8, 2008 | FY2008 | 1 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $3,877,957.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.