Federal award
TOTAL QUALITY SYSTEMS INC
0002
ContractSBIR/STTR SR3
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,002,980.62
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $0.00
- Current value
- $0.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,002,980.62
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- TOTAL QUALITY SYSTEMS INC · F4XQPBFE27V4
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- TOTAL QUALITY SYSTEMS INC · F4XQPBFE27V4
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA8771
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- AE34 · R&D- ECONOMIC GROWTH: MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY (ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT)
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541712 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)
- PIID
- 0002
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- FA822211D0001
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 10 · Jun 23, 2011 to Aug 30, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); SBIR/STTR award
Action History10
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012 | FY2012 | 7 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | FY2012 | 6 | B | $32,575.00 | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 5 | B | $486,694.06 | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 5 | B | $71,996.76 | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | FY2012 | 4 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | FY2011 | 3 | M | $8,000.00 | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | FY2011 | 2 | M | $3,771.94 | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | FY2011 | 1 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | FY2011 | 0 | — | $374,594.86 | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | FY2011 | 0 | — | $25,348.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.