Federal award
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.
0002
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $5,640,425.25
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $5,720,157.00
- Current value
- $5,720,157.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $5,661,746.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. · CM2HHAV628D5
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. · DTZJAQF8NZA1
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97JC · office HQ0147
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97JC
- Product or service (PSC)
- AC21 · NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES; BASIC RESEARCH
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541712 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)
- PIID
- 0002
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- HQ014711D0014
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 10 · Jun 29, 2011 to Jul 28, 2016
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History10
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2016 | FY2016 | 9 | C | −$15,585.75 | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | FY2013 | 8 | B | −$5,735.00 | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FY2013 | 7 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | FY2012 | 6 | B | $0.00 | — |
| May 3, 2012 | FY2012 | 5 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 4 | C | $500,000.00 | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | FY2012 | 3 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | FY2011 | 2 | C | $73,746.00 | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | FY2011 | 1 | C | $1,305,000.00 | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 0 | — | $3,783,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.