Federal award
QED SYSTEMS, INC.
0002
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $4,225,030.75
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $4,225,049.16
- Current value
- $4,225,049.16
- Gross positive obligations
- $4,245,030.75
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- QED SYSTEMS, INC. · N62LME8FBJL6
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- QED SYSTEMS, INC. · N62LME8FBJL6
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N65540
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R425 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL
- Industry (NAICS)
- 336611 · SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIRING
- PIID
- 0002
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N6554009D0026
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 14 · Sep 24, 2009 to Jan 26, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History14
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2012 | FY2012 | 13 | M | $0.00 | — |
| May 16, 2011 | FY2011 | 12 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | FY2011 | 11 | C | $379,387.00 | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | FY2011 | 10 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | FY2011 | 9 | M | $0.00 | — |
| May 20, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | C | $572,433.00 | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | C | $100,000.00 | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | C | $483,400.00 | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | C | $453,900.00 | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | C | $924,623.00 | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FY2010 | 3 | C | −$20,000.00 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | C | $266,816.75 | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | C | $242,454.00 | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $822,017.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.