Federal award
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC.
0002
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $5,016,827.63
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $5,595,479.62
- Current value
- $5,595,479.62
- Gross positive obligations
- $5,609,726.90
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC. · Z2L7LVNEAPC3
- Owner company
- General DynamicsBasis reported by USAspending: the recipient reports this company as its parent; ownership is not reviewed.
- Reported parent
- GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP · VF58HFRNGEL8
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W15P7T
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- R414 · SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0002
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W15P7T10DD410
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 17 · Apr 1, 2011 to Jan 15, 2020
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History17
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2020 | FY2020 | 14 | N | −$10,400.31 | |
| Nov 6, 2018 | FY2019 | 13 | M | $0.00 | |
| Sep 28, 2018 | FY2018 | 12 | C | −$2,008.07 | |
| Jun 14, 2017 | FY2017 | 11 | K | −$133,943.79 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Sep 13, 2016 | FY2016 | 1B | M | −$178,764.07 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Jan 23, 2015 | FY2015 | 1A | C | −$132,285.82 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Nov 14, 2013 | FY2014 | 10 | C | −$135,497.21 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Sep 9, 2013 | FY2013 | 9 | B | $242,400.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Mar 29, 2013 | FY2013 | 8 | M | $1,754,705.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Sep 21, 2012 | FY2012 | 7 | D | $171,478.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Jun 28, 2012 | FY2012 | 6 | B | $0.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Mar 29, 2012 | FY2012 | 5 | G | $1,888,649.89 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Nov 30, 2011 | FY2012 | 4 | M | $0.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Nov 21, 2011 | FY2012 | 3 | M | $0.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Jun 14, 2011 | FY2011 | 2 | M | $0.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FY2011 | 1 | M | $0.00 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
| Apr 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 0 | — | $1,552,494.01 | General Dynamics Information Technology Counted for General Dynamics Information Technology in company totals (direct) |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.