Federal award
TETRA TECH/MEAD AND HUNT JOINT VENTURE
0002
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $5,217,830.45
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $5,217,830.45
- Current value
- $5,217,830.45
- Gross positive obligations
- $5,260,525.89
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- TETRA TECH/MEAD AND HUNT JOINT VENTURE · ZBN6UNKMKTP6
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- TETRA TECH/MEAD AND HUNT JOINT VENTURE · ZBN6UNKMKTP6
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W90FYQ
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- C211 · ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: LANDSCAPING, INTERIOR LAYOUT, AND DESIGNING
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541310 · ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
- PIID
- 0002
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W90FYQ10D0009
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Jul 6, 2012 to Jul 21, 2017
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017 | FY2017 | 11 | D | −$42,695.44 | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | FY2017 | 10 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | FY2015 | 9 | D | $696,635.32 | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | FY2015 | 8 | M | $0.00 | — |
| May 18, 2015 | FY2015 | 7 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | FY2015 | 6 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | FY2014 | 5 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | FY2014 | 4 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | FY2014 | 3 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | FY2014 | 2 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | FY2013 | 1 | D | $210,116.69 | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | FY2012 | 0 | — | $4,353,773.88 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.