Federal award
L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
0003
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $7,698,912.56
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $8,393,884.00
- Current value
- $8,393,884.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $7,868,011.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · FRJQGQHDX4J3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. · DTZJAQF8NZA1
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S0602A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R414 · SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0003
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- FA852709D0090
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 13 · Jun 1, 2009 to Sep 29, 2016
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History13
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016 | FY2016 | 1D | B | −$90,648.25 | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | FY2015 | 1C | B | −$60,214.85 | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | FY2014 | 5 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | FY2014 | 1B | C | −$18,235.34 | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $1,419,888.00 | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $23,123.00 | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FY2010 | 3 | C | $1,977,000.00 | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FY2010 | 3 | C | $23,000.00 | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | FY2010 | 2 | L | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | FY2010 | 1 | M | $1,000,000.00 | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $3,425,000.00 | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $0.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.