Federal award
SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS INC
0005
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $872,810.52
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $905,780.05
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS INC · L9F4NCGGJKR1
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS INC · L9F4NCGGJKR1
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N00164
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R425 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0005
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N0016409DGP20
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 13 · Sep 28, 2012 to Jul 29, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History13
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2014 | FY2014 | 12 | M | −$32,969.53 | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | FY2014 | 11 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | FY2013 | 10 | M | $71,500.00 | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | FY2013 | 9 | M | $46,132.00 | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | FY2013 | 8 | M | $165,500.00 | — |
| May 30, 2013 | FY2013 | 7 | M | $40,000.00 | — |
| May 21, 2013 | FY2013 | 6 | M | $20,000.00 | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | FY2013 | 5 | M | $20,000.00 | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | FY2013 | 4 | M | $50,000.00 | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | FY2013 | 3 | M | $32,046.00 | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | FY2013 | 2 | M | $30,000.00 | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | FY2013 | 1 | M | $10,000.00 | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | FY2012 | 0 | — | $420,602.05 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.