Federal award
ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
0006
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $4,824,489.00
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $5,632,699.00
- Current value
- $5,632,699.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $5,076,907.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC · HX4BQCW632M9
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- ARCTOS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC · HX4BQCW632M9
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA8650
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- AC12 · NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - MILITARY; APPLIED RESEARCH
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541712 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)
- PIID
- 0006
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- FA865008D2806
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 49 · Mar 11, 2008 to Sep 23, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History49
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2014 | FY2014 | 48 | C | $15,000.00 | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | FY2014 | 47 | C | $50,000.00 | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | FY2014 | 46 | C | $151,500.00 | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | FY2014 | 45 | C | $50,000.00 | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | FY2014 | 44 | C | $12,000.00 | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | FY2014 | 43 | C | $65,000.00 | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | FY2014 | 42 | C | $12,000.00 | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | FY2014 | 41 | C | $86,421.00 | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | FY2013 | 40 | C | $12,000.00 | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | FY2013 | 39 | C | $250,000.00 | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | FY2013 | 38 | C | $23,385.00 | — |
| May 6, 2013 | FY2013 | 37 | C | $91,000.00 | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | FY2013 | 36 | C | $23,189.00 | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | FY2013 | 35 | C | $240,000.00 | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | FY2013 | 34 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | FY2013 | 32 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | FY2013 | 33 | C | −$52,418.00 | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 31 | C | $161,644.00 | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | FY2012 | 30 | C | $65,000.00 | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | FY2012 | 29 | C | $102,600.00 | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | FY2012 | 28 | C | $50,000.00 | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | FY2012 | 27 | C | $50,000.00 | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | FY2012 | 26 | C | $300,000.00 | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | FY2012 | 25 | C | $60,000.00 | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | FY2012 | 24 | C | $50,000.00 | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | FY2011 | 23 | C | $72,000.00 | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | FY2011 | 22 | C | $78,022.00 | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | FY2011 | 21 | C | $60,000.00 | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | FY2011 | 20 | C | $25,000.00 | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | FY2011 | 19 | C | $14,000.00 | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 18 | C | $50,000.00 | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | FY2011 | 17 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | FY2011 | 16 | C | $150,000.00 | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | FY2011 | 15 | C | $40,000.00 | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | FY2011 | 14 | C | $250,000.00 | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FY2010 | 13 | C | $586,000.00 | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | FY2010 | 12 | C | $15,000.00 | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FY2010 | 11 | C | $183,000.00 | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | FY2010 | 10 | C | $90,000.00 | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | FY2010 | 9 | C | $100,000.00 | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FY2010 | 8 | C | $10,000.00 | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 7 | C | $52,835.00 | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FY2009 | 6 | C | $197,311.00 | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | FY2009 | 5 | C | $625,000.00 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | FY2008 | 4 | C | −$200,000.00 | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | FY2008 | 3 | C | $200,000.00 | — |
| May 12, 2008 | FY2008 | 2 | C | $12,000.00 | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FY2008 | 1 | C | $40,000.00 | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $306,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.