Federal award
XPO LOGISTICS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC
0006
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $18,705,149.02
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $18,705,149.02
- Current value
- $18,705,149.02
- Gross positive obligations
- $19,344,742.23
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- XPO LOGISTICS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC · E257MHBKZMM3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- XPO LOGISTICS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC · E257MHBKZMM3
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9776 · office HTC711
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- V119 · TRANSPORTATION/TRAVEL/RELOCATION- TRANSPORTATION: OTHER
- Industry (NAICS)
- 488510 · FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ARRANGEMENT
- PIID
- 0006
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- HTC71107D0032
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 10 · Oct 3, 2012 to Jan 27, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History10
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2014 | FY2014 | 9 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | FY2014 | 8 | M | −$22,334.41 | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | FY2013 | 7 | B | $69,695.91 | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | FY2013 | 6 | B | $3,553.00 | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | FY2013 | 5 | B | −$96,814.00 | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | FY2013 | 4 | M | −$36,878.64 | — |
| May 29, 2013 | FY2013 | 3 | B | −$25,383.00 | — |
| May 21, 2013 | FY2013 | 2 | B | −$443,285.00 | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | FY2013 | 1 | B | −$14,898.16 | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | FY2013 | 0 | — | $19,271,493.32 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.