Federal award
BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP
0009
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $762,165,354.91
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $762,165,354.91
- Current value
- $762,165,354.91
- Gross positive obligations
- $886,240,352.62
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP · MJBJKUMUNBY7
- Owner company
- BAE SystemsBasis reviewed link: a dated, evidenced ownership link.
- Reported parent
- BAE SYSTEMS PLC · HPDLRXR4FYX5
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S0107A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- 2350 · COMBAT, ASSAULT, AND TACTICAL VEHICLES, TRACKED
- Industry (NAICS)
- 336992 · MILITARY ARMORED VEHICLE, TANK, AND TANK COMPONENT MANUFACTURING
- PIID
- 0009
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- M6785407D5030
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 53 · Sep 3, 2010 to Jul 2, 2024
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History53
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2024 | FY2024 | 1D | M | $0.00 | |
| Sep 29, 2017 | FY2017 | 52 | B | −$1,320,895.19 | |
| Apr 29, 2016 | FY2016 | 51 | M | −$52,726.90 | |
| Mar 15, 2016 | FY2016 | 50 | M | $148,601.54 | |
| Jan 20, 2016 | FY2016 | 49 | M | −$0.16 | |
| Dec 23, 2015 | FY2016 | 48 | M | $204,325.27 | |
| Oct 26, 2015 | FY2016 | 47 | M | −$2,279,682.68 | |
| Aug 31, 2015 | FY2015 | 46 | M | −$9,939.10 | |
| Aug 12, 2015 | FY2015 | 45 | C | −$0.05 | |
| Jul 15, 2015 | FY2015 | 44 | M | −$198,530.95 | |
| Feb 20, 2013 | FY2013 | 43 | D | −$18.00 | |
| Jan 15, 2013 | FY2013 | 42 | D | $0.00 | |
| Dec 7, 2012 | FY2013 | 41 | D | $0.00 | |
| Dec 5, 2012 | FY2013 | 40 | D | $323,832.45 | |
| Nov 16, 2012 | FY2013 | 39 | D | $86,732.16 | |
| Nov 7, 2012 | FY2013 | 38 | D | −$15,770.65 | |
| Oct 4, 2012 | FY2013 | 37 | M | $0.00 | |
| Sep 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 36 | D | $798,760.81 | |
| Sep 11, 2012 | FY2012 | 35 | D | $0.00 | |
| Aug 31, 2012 | FY2012 | 34 | D | $0.00 | |
| Aug 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 33 | D | $0.00 | |
| Jul 28, 2012 | FY2012 | 32 | D | $0.00 | |
| Jul 25, 2012 | FY2012 | 31 | D | −$33,400.80 | |
| Jul 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 30 | D | $0.00 | |
| Jun 21, 2012 | FY2012 | 29 | D | $33,400.80 | |
| Jun 18, 2012 | FY2012 | 28 | D | $116,841.20 | |
| Apr 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 27 | D | $0.00 | |
| Mar 15, 2012 | FY2012 | 26 | D | $0.00 | |
| Mar 14, 2012 | FY2012 | 25 | D | $0.00 | |
| Mar 12, 2012 | FY2012 | 24 | D | $0.00 | |
| Feb 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 23 | D | $0.00 | |
| Feb 22, 2012 | FY2012 | 22 | D | $0.00 | |
| Feb 13, 2012 | FY2012 | 21 | D | $600.00 | |
| Jan 30, 2012 | FY2012 | 20 | D | $0.00 | |
| Jan 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 19 | D | $262,251.00 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 17 | D | $118,382,586.63 | |
| Jan 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 18 | D | $461,271.00 | |
| Jan 19, 2012 | FY2012 | 16 | D | $7,632,724.32 | |
| Nov 2, 2011 | FY2012 | 15 | M | $0.00 | |
| Sep 21, 2011 | FY2011 | 14 | D | $917,890.18 | |
| Aug 22, 2011 | FY2011 | 13 | D | $3,638,874.00 | |
| Aug 11, 2011 | FY2011 | 12 | D | $8,554,514.10 | |
| Jul 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 11 | M | $0.00 | |
| Jul 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 10 | D | $37,459,328.40 | |
| Jun 17, 2011 | FY2011 | 9 | D | $98,023,006.08 | |
| Mar 24, 2011 | FY2011 | 8 | D | $8,838,973.89 | |
| Feb 9, 2011 | FY2011 | 7 | D | $2,726,000.68 | |
| Dec 22, 2010 | FY2011 | 6 | D | −$17,687,527.40 | |
| Nov 24, 2010 | FY2011 | 5 | D | $0.00 | |
| Nov 23, 2010 | FY2011 | 4 | D | −$102,476,505.83 | |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FY2011 | 2 | D | $276,149,553.50 | |
| Sep 30, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | D | $10,439,676.07 | |
| Sep 3, 2010 | FY2010 | 0 | — | $311,040,608.54 |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.
