Federal award
INNOVATIVE LOGISTICS TECHNIQUES, INC.
0011
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,775,234.61
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,849,281.59
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- INNOVATIVE LOGISTICS TECHNIQUES, INC. · JEQMRHVF25N3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- INNOVATIVE LOGISTICS TECHNIQUES, INC. · JEQMRHVF25N3
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA8622
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R799 · SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: OTHER
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541710 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES
- PIID
- 0011
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- FA862206D8501
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Nov 30, 2007 to Oct 13, 2011
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2011 | FY2012 | 14 | B | −$5,520.90 | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 13 | C | $122,515.33 | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | FY2011 | 11 | B | $63,257.67 | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | FY2011 | 12 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | FY2011 | 10 | C | $304,899.20 | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | FY2010 | 9 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | B | −$68,526.08 | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | FY2010 | 6 | G | $427,714.92 | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | FY2009 | 5 | D | $416,501.29 | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FY2008 | 4 | B | $12,974.22 | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | FY2008 | 3 | B | $501,418.96 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.