Federal award
KRATOS TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, INC.
0012
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $870,043.95
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $1,017,181.00
- Current value
- $1,017,181.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $895,000.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- KRATOS TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, INC. · FLLRPTP8S7N4
- Owner company
- Kratos Defense & Security SolutionsBasis reviewed link: a dated, evidenced ownership link.
- Reported parent
- KRATOS DEFENSE & SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. · H6BWMHGJ5AF5
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S0514A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R425 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0012
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N0016410DWM15
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 11 · Feb 15, 2013 to Feb 27, 2018
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2018 | FY2018 | 1A | C | −$24,956.05 | |
| Jul 9, 2015 | FY2015 | 9 | C | $0.00 | |
| Apr 7, 2014 | FY2014 | 8 | C | $5,000.00 | |
| Jan 14, 2014 | FY2014 | 7 | M | $0.00 | |
| Dec 13, 2013 | FY2014 | 6 | C | $40,000.00 | |
| Sep 12, 2013 | FY2013 | 5 | C | $150,000.00 | |
| Sep 4, 2013 | FY2013 | 4 | C | $50,000.00 | |
| May 6, 2013 | FY2013 | 3 | M | $0.00 | |
| Apr 12, 2013 | FY2013 | 2 | M | $100,000.00 | |
| Mar 28, 2013 | FY2013 | 1 | A | $280,000.00 | |
| Feb 15, 2013 | FY2013 | 0 | — | $270,000.00 |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.