Federal award
SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC.
0016
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $6,044,003.45
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $6,418,518.54
- Current value
- $6,418,518.54
- Gross positive obligations
- $6,207,379.57
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC. · Z5G7R7QDAYD9
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC. · Z5G7R7QDAYD9
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W9113M
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- AC23 · NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES; EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541712 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)
- PIID
- 0016
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W9113M08D0002
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 28 · Dec 22, 2009 to Sep 22, 2019
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History28
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2019 | FY2019 | 27 | C | −$23,601.91 | — |
| May 8, 2018 | FY2018 | 26 | C | −$69,093.43 | — |
| May 19, 2017 | FY2017 | 25 | C | −$6.06 | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | FY2013 | 24 | C | $3,500.00 | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | FY2013 | 23 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | FY2013 | 22 | C | $686,951.71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FY2013 | 21 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | FY2013 | 20 | C | $187,402.00 | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | FY2013 | 19 | C | −$70,674.72 | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | FY2012 | 18 | M | $20,000.00 | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | FY2012 | 17 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | FY2012 | 16 | C | $500,000.00 | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | FY2012 | 15 | D | $170,592.83 | — |
| May 30, 2012 | FY2012 | 14 | M | $168,871.00 | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | FY2012 | 13 | M | $447,230.03 | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | FY2012 | 12 | D | $370,912.00 | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | FY2011 | 11 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | FY2011 | 10 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 9 | C | $774,980.00 | — |
| May 5, 2011 | FY2011 | 8 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | FY2011 | 7 | C | $300,000.00 | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | FY2011 | 6 | C | $300,000.00 | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | A | $598,440.00 | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | C | $200,000.00 | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FY2010 | 3 | C | $169,300.00 | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FY2010 | 2 | C | $809,200.00 | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | C | $350,000.00 | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | FY2010 | 0 | — | $150,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.