Federal award
GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
0023
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,584,332.57
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $1,584,332.57
- Current value
- $1,584,332.57
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,961,181.76
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. · FNEJKBCACXL1
- Owner company
- General DynamicsBasis direct: the recipient is the company's own reviewed UEI.
- Reported parent
- GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP · VF58HFRNGEL8
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office M67854
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- 1015 · GUNS, 75MM THROUGH 125MM
- Industry (NAICS)
- 332993 · AMMUNITION (EXCEPT SMALL ARMS) MANUFACTURING
- PIID
- 0023
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- M6785405D6014
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 11 · Sep 28, 2009 to Jul 31, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2013 | FY2013 | 10 | C | −$21,384.59 | |
| Apr 14, 2011 | FY2011 | 9 | C | −$355,464.60 | |
| Sep 30, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | B | $40,357.76 | |
| Jul 19, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | M | $0.00 | |
| May 21, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | M | $0.00 | |
| May 6, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | B | $0.00 | |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $0.00 | |
| Jan 22, 2010 | FY2010 | 3 | M | $0.00 | |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FY2010 | 2 | B | $189,822.00 | |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | M | $0.00 | |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $1,731,002.00 |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.