Federal award
SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC
0025
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,875,353.09
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $3,881,053.09
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC · DBVDBCAVUFG6
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC · LZYJNMY31GY8
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N39430
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R421 · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0025
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N6247306D3033
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 14 · Sep 30, 2009 to Nov 8, 2016
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History14
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2016 | FY2017 | 13 | K | $89,707.09 | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 12 | M | −$5,700.00 | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | FY2012 | 11 | C | $110,934.00 | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | FY2012 | 10 | C | $126,977.00 | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | FY2012 | 9 | B | $367,424.00 | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | FY2011 | 8 | B | $108,129.00 | — |
| May 10, 2011 | FY2011 | 7 | C | $350,000.00 | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | FY2011 | 6 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | FY2011 | 5 | B | $490,846.00 | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $280,000.00 | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | FY2010 | 3 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 2 | M | $200,036.00 | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $1,757,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.