Skip to content
DefDex

Federal award

INNOVATIVE LOGISTICS TECHNIQUES, INC.

0027

Contract

Obligated and Ceiling

Obligated (net)
$1,727,200.02
Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
—
Current value
—
Gross positive obligations
$1,849,958.13

Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.

Award Details

Recipient
INNOVATIVE LOGISTICS TECHNIQUES, INC. · JEQMRHVF25N3
Owner company
Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
Reported parent
INNOVATIVE LOGISTICS TECHNIQUES, INC. · JEQMRHVF25N3
Awarding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA8622
Funding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700
Product or service (PSC)
R799 · SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: OTHER
Industry (NAICS)
541710 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES
PIID
0027
Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
FA862206D8501
Award type code
C
Actions
20 · Apr 22, 2008 to Jun 8, 2012
Why it is listed
gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)

Open this award on USAspending →

Action History20

Award actions
DateFYModAction typeObligationCompany in company totals
Jun 8, 2012FY201220K−$15,533.79
—
Oct 27, 2011FY201219B−$23,895.04
—
Jul 14, 2011FY201118M$0.00
—
May 13, 2011FY201117C$75,556.75
—
Mar 8, 2011FY201116B$101,079.12
—
Feb 23, 2011FY201115G$76,044.50
—
Jan 14, 2011FY201114F−$74,672.00
—
Oct 15, 2010FY201113B−$8,657.28
—
Sep 14, 2010FY201012M$0.00
—
Aug 3, 2010FY201011C$25,666.67
—
Jul 23, 2010FY201010M$0.00
—
Apr 29, 2010FY20109C$421,498.22
—
Apr 20, 2010FY20108G$102,374.75
—
Jan 7, 2010FY20107C$0.00
—
Dec 30, 2009FY20106M$0.00
—
Dec 1, 2009FY20105C$7,800.00
—
Apr 1, 2009FY20094C$524,430.48
—
Dec 9, 2008FY20093M$0.00
—
Sep 24, 2008FY20082C$17,800.00
—
Apr 22, 2008FY20081G$497,707.64
—

Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.