Federal award
QED SYSTEMS, INC.
0027
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,167,188.04
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $3,211,439.03
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- QED SYSTEMS, INC. · N62LME8FBJL6
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- QED SYSTEMS, INC. · N62LME8FBJL6
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S5111A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R425 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL
- Industry (NAICS)
- 336611 · SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIRING
- PIID
- 0027
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N6554005D0018
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 29 · Sep 24, 2008 to Jun 2, 2017
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History29
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | FY2017 | 1B | C | −$29,905.27 | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | FY2014 | 26 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | FY2013 | 1A | B | −$14,345.72 | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | FY2013 | 25 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | FY2012 | 24 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | FY2012 | 23 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | FY2012 | 22 | C | $36,250.00 | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 21 | C | $9,232.00 | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | FY2011 | 20 | C | $64,583.00 | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 19 | C | $697,302.00 | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | FY2011 | 18 | C | $112,969.00 | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | FY2011 | 17 | M | $127,873.00 | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | FY2011 | 16 | C | $31,289.00 | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | FY2011 | 15 | C | $133,202.00 | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | FY2011 | 14 | C | $9,848.00 | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | FY2011 | 13 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | FY2011 | 12 | C | $5,066.03 | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | FY2010 | 11 | C | $554,801.00 | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 10 | C | $264,556.00 | — |
| May 21, 2010 | FY2010 | 9 | C | $8,221.00 | — |
| May 11, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | C | $7,112.00 | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | C | $29,987.00 | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | FY2010 | 6 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FY2010 | 5 | C | $377,498.00 | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | C | $75,000.00 | — |
| May 20, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | C | $81,400.00 | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | C | $103,400.00 | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | C | $260,000.00 | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $221,850.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.