Federal award
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
0030
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,321,719.03
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,378,163.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. · EPUXNLX5EYC4
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- AECOM · NACNFSZD87F6
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N62742
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- C211 · ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: LANDSCAPING, INTERIOR LAYOUT, AND DESIGNING
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0030
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N6274203D1837
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 13 · Feb 1, 2008 to Sep 17, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History13
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2014 | FY2014 | 12 | B | −$1,689.83 | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | FY2013 | 11 | B | −$54,127.14 | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | FY2013 | 10 | B | −$627.00 | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | FY2013 | 9 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | FY2012 | 8 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | FY2012 | 7 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | FY2011 | 6 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 5 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | FY2010 | 4 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | B | $1,162,784.00 | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | B | $9,450.00 | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FY2008 | 1 | B | $199,629.00 | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $6,300.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.