Federal award
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
0052
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $7,646,816.39
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $51,091.99
- Current value
- $62,196.60
- Gross positive obligations
- $7,697,051.79
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · CN7PNYLZLNV3
- Owner company
- L3Harris TechnologiesBasis direct: the recipient is the company's own reviewed UEI.
- Reported parent
- L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC · SJULQDJ8NZU7
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S2404A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R414 · SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- 0052
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- F0960303D0029
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 30 · Sep 25, 2009 to Oct 5, 2022
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History30
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2022 | FY2023 | 1H | M | $0.00 | |
| Oct 31, 2017 | FY2018 | 1G | C | $46,727.26 | |
| Aug 31, 2017 | FY2017 | 1F | M | $0.00 | |
| Jul 19, 2017 | FY2017 | 1E | C | −$46,727.26 | |
| Sep 9, 2016 | FY2016 | 1D | M | −$3,508.14 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 19 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Aug 17, 2011 | FY2011 | 18 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Jun 2, 2011 | FY2011 | 17 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| May 26, 2011 | FY2011 | 16 | B | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| May 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 15 | C | $32,643.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Mar 31, 2011 | FY2011 | 14 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Mar 24, 2011 | FY2011 | 13 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Mar 15, 2011 | FY2011 | 12 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Feb 4, 2011 | FY2011 | 11 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Dec 16, 2010 | FY2011 | 10 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Dec 15, 2010 | FY2011 | 9 | C | $52,176.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Nov 12, 2010 | FY2011 | 8 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Aug 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | C | $298,611.80 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Aug 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | C | $4,364.73 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Aug 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | C | $67,901.21 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Aug 5, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $105,527.76 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Jun 8, 2010 | FY2010 | 3 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Jan 29, 2010 | FY2010 | 2 | M | $0.00 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Jan 26, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | G | $11,104.61 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Jan 26, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | G | $3,275,368.53 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Jan 26, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | G | $3,230.20 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $1,385,103.49 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $49,361.55 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $2,364,931.65 | — Not credited to any company in company totals |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.