Federal award
JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC
0156
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,340,014.00
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $623,900.46
- Current value
- $623,900.46
- Gross positive obligations
- $2,898,880.85
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC · VN29VGL4X314
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC · MKCAUUG2K7H6
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S1002A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R414 · SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES
- Industry (NAICS)
- 334111 · ELECTRONIC COMPUTER MANUFACTURING
- PIID
- 0156
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- F4260001D0027
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 11 · Dec 31, 2008 to Jun 4, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2014 | FY2014 | 1A | C | −$20,150.00 | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | FY2012 | 3 | B | −$56,181.54 | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | FY2012 | 3 | B | −$1,284,931.49 | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | FY2012 | 3 | B | −$197,603.82 | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | B | $100,000.00 | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | B | $680,082.00 | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | B | $643,583.85 | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $680,082.00 | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $100,000.00 | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $695,133.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.