Federal award
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.
1018
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $15,787,626.85
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $16,120,321.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. · CM2HHAV628D5
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. · DTZJAQF8NZA1
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA8620
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R425 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL
- Industry (NAICS)
- 336413 · OTHER AIRCRAFT PARTS AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING
- PIID
- 1018
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- FA862005G3022
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 11 · Sep 29, 2009 to Sep 17, 2015
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2015 | FY2015 | 10 | K | −$332,694.15 | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 9 | C | $300,000.00 | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | C | $1,000,000.00 | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | C | $100,000.00 | — |
| May 28, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | C | $100,000.00 | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 3 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | FY2010 | 2 | C | $250,000.00 | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | FY2010 | 1 | C | $14,370,321.00 | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $0.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.