Federal award
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
3700
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $32,849,069.71
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $33,047,801.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · K515JRH1JFP3
- Owner company
- Northrop GrummanBasis direct: the recipient is the company's own reviewed UEI.
- Reported parent
- NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION · NKVZLJL93QT6
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97JC · office H95001
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97JC
- Product or service (PSC)
- AC22 · NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES; APPLIED RESEARCH
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541710 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES
- PIID
- 3700
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- H9500105D0002
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 51 · Dec 16, 2008 to Sep 20, 2016
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History51
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2016 | FY2016 | 50 | C | −$156,512.29 | |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 49 | M | $0.00 | |
| Aug 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 48 | B | −$37,811.00 | |
| Nov 3, 2011 | FY2012 | 47 | M | −$2,176.00 | |
| Jul 6, 2011 | FY2011 | 46 | C | $152,210.00 | |
| May 20, 2011 | FY2011 | 45 | B | $199,000.00 | |
| Apr 8, 2011 | FY2011 | 44 | C | $113,000.00 | |
| Apr 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 43 | C | $215,000.00 | |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FY2011 | 42 | B | $0.00 | |
| Oct 5, 2010 | FY2011 | 41 | B | $172,693.00 | |
| Sep 15, 2010 | FY2010 | 40 | M | $40,641.00 | |
| Aug 18, 2010 | FY2010 | 39 | B | $886,388.00 | |
| Jul 30, 2010 | FY2010 | 38 | C | $171,930.00 | |
| Jul 12, 2010 | FY2010 | 37 | B | $0.00 | |
| Jul 7, 2010 | FY2010 | 36 | C | $40,000.00 | |
| Jul 2, 2010 | FY2010 | 35 | C | $1,067,819.00 | |
| May 27, 2010 | FY2010 | 34 | C | $2,400,000.00 | |
| May 4, 2010 | FY2010 | 33 | C | $523,344.00 | |
| Apr 21, 2010 | FY2010 | 32 | C | $2,577,107.00 | |
| Mar 23, 2010 | FY2010 | 31 | C | $500,000.00 | |
| Mar 5, 2010 | FY2010 | 30 | B | $2,225,000.00 | |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FY2010 | 29 | C | $2,378,779.00 | |
| Dec 23, 2009 | FY2010 | 28 | C | $900,000.00 | |
| Dec 4, 2009 | FY2010 | 27 | C | $181,140.00 | |
| Dec 2, 2009 | FY2010 | 26 | G | $1,500,000.00 | |
| Oct 1, 2009 | FY2010 | 25 | B | $568,859.00 | |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FY2009 | 24 | B | $0.00 | |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FY2009 | 23 | C | $60,901.00 | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | FY2009 | 22 | B | $578,097.00 | |
| Sep 14, 2009 | FY2009 | 21 | M | $0.00 | |
| Aug 26, 2009 | FY2009 | 20 | B | $1,009,042.00 | |
| Aug 20, 2009 | FY2009 | 19 | C | $905,766.00 | |
| Aug 7, 2009 | FY2009 | 18 | M | $0.00 | |
| Jul 29, 2009 | FY2009 | 17 | M | $0.00 | |
| Jul 24, 2009 | FY2009 | 16 | B | $479,608.00 | |
| Jun 18, 2009 | FY2009 | 15 | M | $866,380.00 | |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FY2009 | 14 | C | $506,747.00 | |
| Jun 2, 2009 | FY2009 | 13 | C | $478,099.00 | |
| May 29, 2009 | FY2009 | 12 | M | $0.00 | |
| May 6, 2009 | FY2009 | 11 | C | $282,687.00 | |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FY2009 | 10 | C | $475,741.00 | |
| Mar 31, 2009 | FY2009 | 9 | C | $977,118.00 | |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 7 | C | $340,145.00 | |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 8 | C | −$2,232.00 | |
| Mar 16, 2009 | FY2009 | 6 | B | $5,241,882.00 | |
| Mar 6, 2009 | FY2009 | 5 | C | $877,186.00 | |
| Feb 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | G | $0.00 | |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | G | $0.00 | |
| Jan 27, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | A | $0.00 | |
| Jan 15, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | C | $148,790.00 | |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $3,006,702.00 |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.