Federal award
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
5025
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,888,718.00
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $1,888,718.00
- Current value
- $1,888,718.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,889,827.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · YV6LBTHNVE83
- Owner company
- Northrop GrummanBasis direct: the recipient is the company's own reviewed UEI.
- Reported parent
- NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION · NKVZLJL93QT6
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA4600
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 5700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R414 · SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541512 · COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES
- PIID
- 5025
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- FA460008D0002
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Apr 27, 2009 to Jun 13, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2013 | FY2013 | 11 | K | $0.00 | |
| Nov 10, 2011 | FY2012 | 10 | M | $0.00 | |
| May 24, 2011 | FY2011 | 9 | M | $68,976.00 | |
| Nov 4, 2010 | FY2011 | 8 | B | $0.00 | |
| Aug 16, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | B | $0.00 | |
| May 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | L | −$27.00 | |
| Mar 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | D | $235,109.00 | |
| Feb 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $0.00 | |
| Jan 28, 2010 | FY2010 | 3 | C | −$1,082.00 | |
| Nov 3, 2009 | FY2010 | 2 | M | $0.00 | |
| Oct 22, 2009 | FY2010 | 1 | M | $0.00 | |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $1,585,742.00 |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.