Federal award
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.
7652
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- −$89,774.86
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $143,699.14
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- L-3 COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. · ZVSWRLZC9757
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. · DTZJAQF8NZA1
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97ZS · office H92254
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97ZS
- Product or service (PSC)
- K099 · MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT- MISCELLANEOUS
- Industry (NAICS)
- 488190 · OTHER SUPPORT ACTIVITIES FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION
- PIID
- 7652
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- USZA2203D0006
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Nov 18, 2007 to Aug 18, 2010
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2010 | FY2010 | 12 | C | $17,812.14 | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FY2010 | 11 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | FY2010 | 10 | C | −$19,048.00 | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | FY2010 | 9 | M | $0.00 | — |
| May 21, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | M | $0.00 | — |
| May 6, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FY2009 | 6 | D | $125,887.00 | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FY2009 | 5 | C | −$40.00 | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | FY2008 | 3 | M | −$1,217.00 | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FY2008 | 2 | M | −$213,169.00 | — |
| Nov 18, 2007 | FY2008 | 1 | D | $0.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.