Federal award
TRI-FORCE CONSULTING SERVICES INC
EFE1
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $2,087,011.52
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $3,365,323.92
- Current value
- $2,306,235.96
- Gross positive obligations
- $2,296,235.96
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- TRI-FORCE CONSULTING SERVICES INC · XYX2JP7AC7C3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- TRI-FORCE CONSULTING SERVICES INC · XYX2JP7AC7C3
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N62473
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- D308 · IT AND TELECOM- PROGRAMMING
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- EFE1
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N0017807D5284
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 11 · Sep 30, 2008 to Dec 4, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2013 | FY2014 | 11 | B | −$5,491.95 | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 1A | B | −$203,732.49 | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | FY2012 | 10 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | FY2011 | 9 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | B | $1,107,975.96 | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | B | $15,000.00 | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | B | $556,388.00 | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | M | $30,000.00 | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | FY2009 | 1 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $586,872.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.
