Federal award
TECHNICAL SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, INC.
HR06
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $2,791,191.39
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $4,012,826.51
- Current value
- $4,012,826.51
- Gross positive obligations
- $2,831,691.39
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- TECHNICAL SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, INC. · P4BBRBNDY3R3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- TECHNICAL SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, INC. · P4BBRBNDY3R3
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N61331
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R425 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- HR06
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N0017804D4147
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 50 · Dec 16, 2008 to Dec 10, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History50
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2013 | FY2014 | 49 | C | $28,000.00 | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | FY2013 | 48 | C | $80,000.00 | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | FY2013 | 47 | C | $41,250.00 | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | FY2013 | 46 | C | $24,169.00 | — |
| May 10, 2013 | FY2013 | 45 | C | $38,000.00 | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | FY2013 | 44 | C | $28,105.00 | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | FY2013 | 43 | C | $182,625.00 | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FY2013 | 42 | C | $85,600.00 | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | FY2012 | 41 | C | $22,000.00 | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | FY2012 | 40 | C | $87,200.00 | — |
| May 2, 2012 | FY2012 | 39 | C | $53,600.00 | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | FY2012 | 38 | C | $85,432.00 | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | FY2012 | 37 | C | $68,000.00 | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | FY2012 | 36 | C | $60,000.00 | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | FY2012 | 35 | C | $10,000.00 | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | FY2011 | 34 | C | $8,200.00 | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | FY2011 | 33 | C | $24,000.00 | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | FY2011 | 32 | C | $50,864.00 | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 31 | C | $20,000.00 | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 30 | M | $51,099.00 | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | FY2011 | 29 | M | $44,204.00 | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 28 | M | $6,300.00 | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | FY2011 | 27 | M | $20,000.00 | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FY2011 | 26 | M | $17,522.00 | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | FY2011 | 25 | M | $6,470.00 | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | FY2011 | 24 | M | $42,200.00 | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 23 | M | $69,720.00 | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | FY2010 | 22 | M | $25,000.00 | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | FY2010 | 21 | M | $137,700.00 | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | FY2010 | 20 | M | $21,431.39 | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | FY2010 | 19 | M | $72,135.00 | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | FY2010 | 18 | M | $66,000.00 | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 17 | M | −$40,500.00 | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | FY2010 | 16 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 15 | C | $120,000.00 | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | FY2010 | 14 | C | $67,375.00 | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | FY2010 | 13 | C | $145,000.00 | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | FY2010 | 12 | C | $74,400.00 | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | FY2010 | 11 | C | $99,000.00 | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | FY2010 | 10 | C | $70,000.00 | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | FY2009 | 9 | C | $33,000.00 | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | FY2009 | 8 | C | $53,000.00 | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FY2009 | 7 | C | $72,428.00 | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FY2009 | 6 | C | $18,000.00 | — |
| May 29, 2009 | FY2009 | 5 | C | $22,000.00 | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | C | $196,165.38 | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | C | $138,579.62 | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FY2009 | 1 | C | $45,917.00 | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $100,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.
