Federal award
KRATOS TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, INC.
NS05
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $4,541,165.67
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $4,874,522.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- KRATOS TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, INC. · FLLRPTP8S7N4
- Owner company
- Kratos Defense & Security SolutionsBasis reviewed link: a dated, evidenced ownership link.
- Reported parent
- KRATOS DEFENSE & SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. · H6BWMHGJ5AF5
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S0514A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 1700
- Product or service (PSC)
- R425 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- NS05
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- N0017804D4131
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 52 · Oct 15, 2007 to Apr 14, 2017
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History52
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | FY2017 | 1G | C | −$35,664.24 | |
| May 5, 2016 | FY2016 | 1F | C | −$49,973.11 | |
| Jun 8, 2015 | FY2015 | 1E | C | −$63,106.41 | |
| Sep 18, 2014 | FY2014 | 1D | C | −$1,959.75 | |
| Aug 13, 2014 | FY2014 | 1C | C | −$86,365.57 | |
| Sep 9, 2013 | FY2013 | 1B | B | −$128.45 | |
| Jul 31, 2013 | FY2013 | 1A | B | −$72,675.80 | |
| Aug 10, 2012 | FY2012 | 36 | M | $77,500.00 | |
| May 7, 2012 | FY2012 | 35 | M | $100.00 | |
| May 7, 2012 | FY2012 | 35 | M | $187,400.00 | |
| Feb 22, 2012 | FY2012 | 34 | M | $0.00 | |
| Jan 26, 2012 | FY2012 | 33 | C | $9,000.00 | |
| Jan 26, 2012 | FY2012 | 33 | C | $226,000.00 | |
| Dec 8, 2011 | FY2012 | 32 | C | $46,000.00 | |
| Oct 27, 2011 | FY2012 | 31 | C | $5,000.00 | |
| Oct 27, 2011 | FY2012 | 31 | C | $127,000.00 | |
| Aug 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 30 | G | $0.00 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 | FY2011 | 29 | C | $12,000.00 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 | FY2011 | 29 | C | $106,431.00 | |
| May 16, 2011 | FY2011 | 28 | C | $211,191.00 | |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FY2011 | 27 | C | $286,000.00 | |
| Mar 21, 2011 | FY2011 | 26 | C | $40,000.00 | |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FY2011 | 25 | C | $5,000.00 | |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FY2011 | 25 | C | $134,378.00 | |
| Nov 18, 2010 | FY2011 | 24 | C | $124,000.00 | |
| Oct 20, 2010 | FY2011 | 23 | C | $81,000.00 | |
| Oct 20, 2010 | FY2011 | 23 | C | $5,000.00 | |
| Sep 27, 2010 | FY2010 | 22 | G | $0.00 | |
| Aug 27, 2010 | FY2010 | 21 | C | $147,000.00 | |
| Aug 25, 2010 | FY2010 | 20 | C | $6,244.00 | |
| Aug 25, 2010 | FY2010 | 20 | C | −$6,244.00 | |
| Jul 13, 2010 | FY2010 | 19 | C | $41,000.00 | |
| Apr 12, 2010 | FY2010 | 18 | C | $41,000.00 | |
| Feb 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 17 | C | $115,000.00 | |
| Feb 24, 2010 | FY2010 | 17 | C | $5,000.00 | |
| Jan 28, 2010 | FY2010 | 16 | G | $692,000.00 | |
| Jan 28, 2010 | FY2010 | 16 | G | $29,000.00 | |
| Sep 22, 2009 | FY2009 | 15 | G | $212,000.00 | |
| Aug 25, 2009 | FY2009 | 14 | C | $7,000.00 | |
| Aug 17, 2009 | FY2009 | 13 | C | −$17,239.00 | |
| Jul 29, 2009 | FY2009 | 12 | C | $73,000.00 | |
| Jul 20, 2009 | FY2009 | 11 | C | $76,239.00 | |
| Apr 14, 2009 | FY2009 | 10 | C | $56,239.00 | |
| Feb 11, 2009 | FY2009 | 9 | C | $464,000.00 | |
| Nov 6, 2008 | FY2009 | 8 | C | $370,000.00 | |
| Sep 26, 2008 | FY2008 | 7 | G | $46,000.00 | |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FY2008 | 6 | C | $98,800.00 | |
| May 7, 2008 | FY2008 | 5 | C | $80,000.00 | |
| Jan 23, 2008 | FY2008 | 4 | C | $326,000.00 | |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FY2008 | 3 | C | $237,000.00 | |
| Nov 15, 2007 | FY2008 | 2 | C | $69,000.00 | |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FY2008 | 1 | M | $0.00 |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.