Federal award
CATAPULT TECHNOLOGY, LTD.
W91QUZ08F0069
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $2,257,709.62
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $2,265,952.42
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- CATAPULT TECHNOLOGY, LTD. · DMKJDPH3DXP7
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- CATAPULT TECHNOLOGY, LTD. · DMKJDPH3DXP7
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W91QUZ
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- R799 · SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: OTHER
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541512 · COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES
- PIID
- W91QUZ08F0069
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- GS06F0511Z
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Sep 30, 2008 to Sep 27, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2012 | FY2012 | P00011 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | FY2012 | P00010 | M | $0.00 | — |
| May 24, 2011 | FY2011 | P00009 | M | $512,078.79 | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | FY2011 | P00008 | M | −$8,242.80 | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | FY2011 | P00007 | G | $169,972.89 | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | FY2010 | P00006 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | FY2010 | P00005 | G | $647,354.42 | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FY2009 | P00004 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | FY2009 | P00003 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | FY2009 | P00002 | G | $636,693.74 | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | FY2009 | P00001 | C | $176,552.58 | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $123,300.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.