Federal award
CHOCTAW ARCHIVING ENTERPRISE
YY23
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,466,895.62
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,598,940.85
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- CHOCTAW ARCHIVING ENTERPRISE · KE46KWKSBMN3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA · GNZLNKLREX72
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W81K00
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- Q401 · MEDICAL- NURSING
- Industry (NAICS)
- 622110 · GENERAL MEDICAL AND SURGICAL HOSPITALS
- PIID
- YY23
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W81K0007D0007
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 29 · Nov 2, 2007 to May 17, 2013
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History29
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2013 | FY2013 | 29 | K | −$15,501.57 | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | FY2013 | 28 | C | −$6,633.83 | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | FY2013 | 27 | C | $156,441.60 | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | FY2012 | 26 | C | −$18,662.29 | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 25 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | FY2012 | 24 | C | −$12,004.72 | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | FY2012 | 23 | G | $312,883.20 | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | FY2011 | 22 | C | $3,253.75 | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | FY2011 | 21 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FY2011 | 20 | C | −$3,253.75 | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | FY2011 | 19 | C | $299,865.60 | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | FY2010 | 18 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | FY2010 | 17 | C | −$10,104.41 | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FY2010 | 16 | G | $0.00 | — |
| May 5, 2010 | FY2010 | 15 | C | −$10,605.15 | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | FY2010 | 14 | C | $287,769.60 | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | FY2009 | 13 | C | −$3,597.00 | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FY2009 | 12 | G | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | FY2009 | 11 | C | −$4,004.66 | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | FY2009 | 10 | D | −$6,794.49 | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | FY2009 | 9 | C | $276,249.60 | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FY2008 | 8 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FY2008 | 7 | C | $14,397.50 | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FY2008 | 6 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FY2008 | 5 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | FY2008 | 4 | C | −$33,978.10 | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FY2008 | 3 | G | $0.00 | — |
| May 1, 2008 | FY2008 | 2 | C | −$6,905.26 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FY2008 | 1 | B | $248,080.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.