Federal award
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE
DASG6003C0006
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,118,661.17
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $0.00
- Current value
- $4,074.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $3,160,410.32
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE · HB6KNGVNJRU1
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SYSTEM · TWJWHYEM8T63
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 9763 · office S0107A
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- AC23 · NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES; EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541512 · COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES
- PIID
- DASG6003C0006
- Award type code
- D
- Actions
- 27 · Feb 26, 2008 to Jun 20, 2024
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History27
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024 | FY2024 | ARZ996 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | FY2014 | P00061 | C | −$1,437.15 | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | FY2013 | P00060 | C | −$6,474.07 | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FY2012 | P00059 | C | −$3,312.90 | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | FY2011 | P00058 | C | $131,894.66 | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | FY2011 | P00057 | M | $465,000.00 | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | FY2011 | P00056 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | FY2011 | P00055 | C | $75,000.00 | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FY2011 | P00054 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | FY2010 | P00053 | M | $75,000.00 | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FY2010 | P00052 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | FY2010 | P00051 | C | $100,000.00 | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | FY2010 | P00050 | C | $104,918.00 | — |
| May 10, 2010 | FY2010 | P00049 | M | −$5,992.03 | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | FY2010 | P00048 | C | $857,760.00 | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FY2010 | P00047 | M | $41,176.89 | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | FY2009 | P00046 | C | $129,477.87 | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | FY2009 | P00045 | G | $514,907.33 | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | FY2009 | P00044 | C | $40,000.00 | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | FY2009 | P00043 | C | $24,832.00 | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | FY2009 | P00042 | C | $100,000.00 | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FY2009 | P00041 | C | $160,443.57 | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | FY2009 | P00040 | C | $150,000.00 | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FY2008 | P00039 | C | $50,000.00 | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | FY2008 | P00038 | C | $140,000.00 | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FY2008 | P00037 | C | −$13,156.00 | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | FY2008 | P00036 | C | −$11,377.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.