Federal award
SYSTEMATIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
DEAT5208NA28732
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,011,995.85
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $10,713,026.00
- Current value
- $8,384,547.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $4,921,902.05
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- SYSTEMATIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. · WNWGCANCH4Y9
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- SYSTEMATIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. · WNWGCANCH4Y9
- Awarding agency
- Department of Energy · sub-agency 8900 · office 00059
- Funding agency
- Department of Energy · sub-agency 8900
- Product or service (PSC)
- R499 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541611 · ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
- PIID
- DEAT5208NA28732
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- GS10F0012L
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 10 · Sep 1, 2008 to Jan 24, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History10
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 9 | C | −$6,446.33 | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | FY2011 | 8 | M | −$484,557.82 | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | FY2010 | 7 | C | $1,000,000.00 | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FY2010 | 6 | G | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | FY2009 | 5 | C | $3,000.00 | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | FY2009 | 4 | C | $1,000,000.00 | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | C | $1,418,902.05 | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FY2009 | A001 | B | −$1,418,902.05 | — |
| Sep 1, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $1,500,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.