Skip to content
DefDex

Federal award

CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP

FA445211C0009

Contract

Obligated and Ceiling

Obligated (net)
$9,949,463.68
Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
$9,949,463.68
Current value
$9,949,463.68
Gross positive obligations
$10,660,974.31

Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.

Award Details

Recipient
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP · KNW6WWRKELJ3
Owner company
Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
Reported parent
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP · KNW6WWRKELJ3
Awarding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA4452
Funding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700
Product or service (PSC)
R499 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER
Industry (NAICS)
541690 · OTHER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
PIID
FA445211C0009
Award type code
D
Actions
17 · Sep 16, 2011 to Feb 3, 2015
Why it is listed
gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)

Open this award on USAspending →

Action History17

Award actions
DateFYModAction typeObligationCompany in company totals
Feb 3, 2015FY2015P00016C−$245,743.06
—
Jan 14, 2013FY2013P00015M$0.00
—
Jan 11, 2013FY2013P00014G$706,188.21
—
Jan 2, 2013FY2013P00013G$906,022.50
—
Dec 27, 2012FY2013P00012G$468,016.50
—
Sep 25, 2012FY2012P00011C$457.40
—
Sep 13, 2012FY2012P00010C−$154,624.01
—
Aug 3, 2012FY2012P00009C$3,161,227.22
—
Jul 19, 2012FY2012P00008C$109,504.00
—
Mar 28, 2012FY2012P00007C$57,055.00
—
Mar 20, 2012FY2012P00006C$154,878.78
—
Oct 3, 2011FY2012P00005C$311,143.56
—
Sep 22, 2011FY2011P00004M$0.00
—
Sep 21, 2011FY2011P00002C$977,937.72
—
Sep 21, 2011FY2011P00003C$162,774.96
—
Sep 16, 2011FY2011P00001M−$311,143.56
—
Sep 16, 2011FY20110—$3,645,768.46
—

Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.