Skip to content
DefDex

Federal award

HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

FA701409C0058

Contract

Obligated and Ceiling

Obligated (net)
$3,987,520.53
Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
$1,715,880.35
Current value
$1,715,880.35
Gross positive obligations
$4,114,883.75

Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.

Award Details

Recipient
HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · GJ4HVG535VM9
Owner company
Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
Reported parent
HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · GJ4HVG535VM9
Awarding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA8734
Funding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700
Product or service (PSC)
R409 · PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Industry (NAICS)
541519 · OTHER COMPUTER RELATED SERVICES
PIID
FA701409C0058
Award type code
D
Actions
18 · Jul 7, 2009 to Sep 9, 2015
Why it is listed
gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)

Open this award on USAspending →

Action History18

Award actions
DateFYModAction typeObligationCompany in company totals
Sep 9, 2015FY2015P00016N−$127,363.22
—
Jul 20, 2015FY2015P00015G$191,044.83
—
Jun 22, 2015FY2015P00014G$63,681.61
—
May 26, 2015FY2015P00013B$63,681.61
—
Dec 22, 2014FY2015P00012B$319,913.40
—
Jul 9, 2014FY2014P00011M$0.00
—
Jun 26, 2014FY2014P00010G$383,818.42
—
Jun 24, 2014FY2014P00009B$0.00
—
Sep 11, 2013FY2013P00008B$16,745.00
—
Jun 24, 2013FY2013P00007G$821,103.70
—
Oct 18, 2012FY2013P00006M$0.00
—
May 3, 2012FY2012P00004M$0.00
—
Jun 24, 2011FY2011P00003G$773,968.98
—
Jun 29, 2010FY2010P00002G$751,426.20
—
Jun 29, 2010FY2010P00001M$0.00
—
Jul 7, 2009FY20090—$0.00
—
Jul 7, 2009FY20090—$729,500.00
—
Jul 7, 2009FY20090—$0.00
—

Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.