Skip to content
DefDex

Federal award

INTEGRATABLE TECHNOLOGIES LLC

FA820108C0075

Contract

Obligated and Ceiling

Obligated (net)
$1,117,534.70
Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
$2,340,873.67
Current value
$1,117,534.70
Gross positive obligations
$1,161,403.90

Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.

Award Details

Recipient
INTEGRATABLE TECHNOLOGIES LLC · NZ2HAHQPLYB4
Owner company
Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
Reported parent
INTEGRATABLE TECHNOLOGIES LLC · NZ2HAHQPLYB4
Awarding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700 · office FA8201
Funding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 5700
Product or service (PSC)
D306 · IT AND TELECOM- SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
Industry (NAICS)
541618 · OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
PIID
FA820108C0075
Award type code
D
Actions
18 · Sep 26, 2008 to Dec 30, 2013
Why it is listed
gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)

Open this award on USAspending →

Action History18

Award actions
DateFYModAction typeObligationCompany in company totals
Dec 30, 2013FY2014P00018K−$19,552.40
—
Apr 27, 2012FY2012P00017B$24,551.80
—
Feb 29, 2012FY2012P00016B$24,551.80
—
Jan 20, 2012FY2012P00015C$24,551.80
—
Dec 30, 2011FY2012P00014B$0.00
—
Dec 29, 2010FY2011P00013G$152,310.80
—
Sep 23, 2010FY2010P00012D$3,700.00
—
Jul 15, 2010FY2010P00011M$0.00
—
Jan 6, 2010FY2010P00009M$0.00
—
Jan 6, 2010FY2010P00008C$147,013.50
—
Dec 30, 2009FY2010P00007G$0.00
—
Nov 18, 2009FY2010P00006C$8,678.40
—
Oct 1, 2009FY2010P00005C$84,316.80
—
Sep 17, 2009FY2009P00004M$0.00
—
Aug 4, 2009FY2009P00003M$0.00
—
Jan 15, 2009FY2009P00002M−$24,316.80
—
Dec 17, 2008FY2009P00001C$504,104.13
—
Sep 26, 2008FY20080—$187,624.87
—

Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.