Federal award
VALENCE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
H9222213C0032
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $1,258,134.30
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $1,541,970.48
- Current value
- $1,308,134.30
- Gross positive obligations
- $1,258,134.30
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- VALENCE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. · LCLNNKAUDKM3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- VALENCE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. · LCLNNKAUDKM3
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97ZS · office H92222
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97ZS
- Product or service (PSC)
- AC65 · R&D- DEFENSE SYSTEM: ELECTRONICS/COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- H9222213C0032
- Award type code
- D
- Actions
- 11 · Aug 19, 2013 to Feb 9, 2016
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2016 | FY2016 | P00011 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | FY2016 | P00010 | B | $85,750.00 | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | FY2015 | P00009 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | FY2015 | P00008 | C | $228,008.00 | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | FY2015 | P00007 | C | $300,000.00 | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | FY2015 | P00005 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | FY2015 | P00004 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | FY2014 | P00003 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | FY2014 | P00002 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | FY2014 | P00001 | M | $371,653.78 | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | FY2013 | 0 | — | $272,722.52 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.