Skip to content
DefDex

Federal award

SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC

N6893609C0003

Contract

Obligated and Ceiling

Obligated (net)
$42,783,878.31
Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
$51,023,054.14
Current value
$51,023,054.14
Gross positive obligations
$44,491,116.97

Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.

Award Details

Owner company
Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
Reported parent
SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC · LZYJNMY31GY8
Awarding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 1700 · office N68936
Funding agency
Department of War · sub-agency 1700
Product or service (PSC)
R407 · PROGRAM EVALUATION SERVICES
Industry (NAICS)
541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
PIID
N6893609C0003
Award type code
D
Actions
19 · Oct 30, 2008 to Aug 14, 2013
Why it is listed
gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)

Open this award on USAspending →

Action History19

Award actions
DateFYModAction typeObligationCompany in company totals
Aug 14, 2013FY2013P00018C−$1,707,238.66
—
Aug 17, 2011FY2011P00017M$0.00
—
Apr 21, 2011FY2011P00016C$2,000,000.00
—
Mar 14, 2011FY2011P00015B$0.00
—
Dec 20, 2010FY2011P00014B$3,100,000.00
—
Oct 12, 2010FY2011P00013C$4,471,116.97
—
Sep 24, 2010FY2010P00012G$20,000.00
—
Aug 4, 2010FY2010P00011M$0.00
—
Jul 22, 2010FY2010P00010C$4,000,000.00
—
Mar 12, 2010FY2010P00009M$0.00
—
Nov 2, 2009FY2010P00008M$900,000.00
—
Oct 1, 2009FY2010P00007C$15,000,000.00
—
Sep 24, 2009FY2009P00006B$0.00
—
Aug 10, 2009FY2009P00005B$0.00
—
Jul 7, 2009FY2009P00004B$0.00
—
Apr 30, 2009FY2009P00003B$6,000,000.00
—
Dec 16, 2008FY2009P00002M$0.00
—
Dec 5, 2008FY2009P00001M$0.00
—
Oct 30, 2008FY20090—$9,000,000.00
—

Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.