Federal award
ATK SPACE SYSTEMS INC.
NNG06CA22C
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $8,941,680.44
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $15,428,861.00
- Current value
- $15,428,861.00
- Gross positive obligations
- $9,030,486.00
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- ATK SPACE SYSTEMS INC. · ELCNW8UT5561
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS LLC · GJVCPEBZV574
- Awarding agency
- NASA · sub-agency 8000 · office 80GSFC
- Funding agency
- NASA · sub-agency 8000
- Product or service (PSC)
- AR14 · SPACE R&D SERVICES; SPACE FLIGHT, RESEARCH AND SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES; R&D ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
- Industry (NAICS)
- 336414 · GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING
- PIID
- NNG06CA22C
- Award type code
- D
- Actions
- 30 · Nov 5, 2007 to Sep 18, 2017
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History30
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2017 | FY2017 | 43 | C | −$88,805.56 | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | FY2011 | 42 | C | $30,000.00 | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 41 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | FY2011 | 40 | C | $200,156.00 | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | FY2011 | 39 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | FY2011 | 38 | C | $40,000.00 | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FY2010 | 37 | B | $40,000.00 | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | FY2010 | 36 | C | $10,000.00 | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | FY2010 | 35 | C | $80,000.00 | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | FY2010 | 34 | C | $85,000.00 | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | FY2010 | 33 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | FY2010 | 32 | C | $100,000.00 | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | FY2009 | 31 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | FY2009 | 30 | C | $350,000.00 | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | FY2009 | 29 | C | $10,000.00 | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | FY2009 | 28 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | FY2009 | 27 | C | $1,000,000.00 | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | FY2009 | 26 | C | $665,000.00 | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 25 | C | $720,330.00 | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | FY2009 | 24 | C | $500,000.00 | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | FY2009 | 23 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FY2008 | 22 | B | $1,200,000.00 | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FY2008 | 21 | C | $1,000,000.00 | — |
| May 22, 2008 | FY2008 | 20 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FY2008 | 19 | B | $1,200,000.00 | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | FY2008 | 18 | C | $1,000,000.00 | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FY2008 | 17 | C | $500,000.00 | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | FY2008 | 15 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | FY2008 | 16 | C | $300,000.00 | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | FY2008 | 14 | B | $0.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.