Federal award
MISSION SYSTEMS ORCHARD PARK INC
NNJ08JB40P
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $2,122,410.29
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- —
- Current value
- —
- Gross positive obligations
- $2,124,427.16
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- MISSION SYSTEMS ORCHARD PARK INC · JAGFLJSK5229
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- COBHAM PLC · HMN8Q5FPFFD3
- Awarding agency
- NASA · sub-agency 8000 · office JSC00
- Funding agency
- NASA · sub-agency 8000
- Product or service (PSC)
- 3695 · MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY
- Industry (NAICS)
- 336419 · OTHER GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE PARTS AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING
- PIID
- NNJ08JB40P
- Award type code
- B
- Actions
- 13 · Aug 7, 2008 to Aug 19, 2015
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History13
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2015 | FY2015 | 16 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | FY2015 | 15 | M | −$2,016.87 | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | FY2012 | 14 | B | $190,972.00 | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | FY2012 | 13 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | FY2011 | 11 | M | $386,038.00 | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | FY2010 | 8 | B | $547,355.03 | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FY2010 | 6 | B | $0.00 | — |
| May 3, 2010 | FY2010 | 5 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | B | $7,572.00 | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | FY2009 | 3 | B | $542,631.00 | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | FY2009 | 2 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FY2008 | 1 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $449,859.13 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.
