Federal award
CHERRY CONSULTING OF THE CAROLINAS, INC.
W9124708C0004
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,298,959.79
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $4,141,949.95
- Current value
- $4,141,949.79
- Gross positive obligations
- $3,298,959.79
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- CHERRY CONSULTING OF THE CAROLINAS, INC. · G4JGBZ5VKN13
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- CHERRY CONSULTING OF THE CAROLINAS, INC. · G4JGBZ5VKN13
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W91247
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- AS91
- Industry (NAICS)
- 485113 · BUS AND OTHER MOTOR VEHICLE TRANSIT SYSTEMS
- PIID
- W9124708C0004
- Award type code
- D
- Actions
- 12 · Feb 8, 2008 to Feb 16, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2012 | FY2012 | P00011 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | FY2012 | P00010 | G | $168,598.00 | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | FY2011 | P00009 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | FY2011 | P00008 | G | $963,417.58 | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FY2010 | P00007 | A | $196,035.29 | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FY2010 | P00005 | D | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FY2010 | P00006 | G | $688,749.00 | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | FY2009 | P00004 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | FY2009 | P00003 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | FY2009 | P00002 | G | $655,951.92 | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | FY2008 | P00001 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | FY2008 | 0 | — | $626,208.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.
