Federal award
OVERLOOK SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
W91WAW09C0008
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $3,612,255.23
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $3,934,097.25
- Current value
- $3,934,097.25
- Gross positive obligations
- $3,929,481.59
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- OVERLOOK SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · WTBCF4RER7H5
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- OVERLOOK SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · WTBCF4RER7H5
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W91WAW
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 97AD
- Product or service (PSC)
- R408 · SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541330 · ENGINEERING SERVICES
- PIID
- W91WAW09C0008
- Award type code
- D
- Actions
- 12 · Nov 26, 2008 to Jan 7, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2014 | FY2014 | P00011 | M | −$332.24 | — |
| May 25, 2010 | FY2010 | P00010 | M | −$16,713.67 | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | FY2010 | P00009 | B | $529,756.84 | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FY2010 | P00008 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FY2009 | P00007 | M | −$299,997.54 | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | FY2009 | P00006 | C | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FY2009 | P00005 | M | −$182.91 | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | FY2009 | P00004 | M | $300,000.00 | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | FY2009 | P00003 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | FY2009 | P00002 | C | $1,900,000.00 | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FY2009 | P00001 | M | $199,724.75 | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $1,000,000.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.