Federal award
INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORP
W91ZLK12P0123
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $117,499.84
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $117,499.84
- Current value
- $117,499.84
- Gross positive obligations
- $117,499.87
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORP · XWZGLLP986R3
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORP · XWZGLLP986R3
- Awarding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100 · office W56ZTN
- Funding agency
- Department of War · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- R607 · SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: WORD PROCESSING/TYPING
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541611 · ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
- PIID
- W91ZLK12P0123
- Award type code
- B
- Actions
- 11 · Jan 18, 2012 to Jan 16, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $100k or more (contracts)
Action History11
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2014 | FY2014 | P00010 | G | $23,499.96 | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | FY2014 | P00009 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | FY2013 | P00008 | C | $13,708.31 | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | FY2013 | P00007 | C | $17,624.97 | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | FY2013 | P00006 | C | $2.00 | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | FY2013 | P00005 | G | $15,664.64 | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | FY2012 | P00004 | M | −$0.03 | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | FY2012 | P00002 | M | $35,249.99 | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | FY2012 | P00003 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | FY2012 | P00001 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | FY2012 | 0 | — | $11,750.00 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.