Federal award
MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES
0002
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $11,187,862.79
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $12,196,950.51
- Current value
- $12,112,992.04
- Gross positive obligations
- $11,190,232.74
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES · LN9PU5M2YZN5
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES · LN9PU5M2YZN5
- Awarding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100 · office W91GDW
- Funding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- AD25 · R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: SERVICES (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)
- Industry (NAICS)
- 523910 · MISCELLANEOUS INTERMEDIATION
- PIID
- 0002
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W91GDW09D4033
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Dec 28, 2009 to Apr 17, 2012
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $250k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2012 | FY2012 | 7 | M | $105,729.91 | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | FY2012 | 6 | M | $871.61 | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | FY2012 | 5 | B | $111,028.66 | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | FY2011 | 1J | M | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | FY2011 | 1H | M | $0.00 | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | FY2011 | 1G | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 4 | G | $1,470,609.52 | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | FY2011 | 3 | B | −$2,369.95 | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 2 | G | $3,419,694.19 | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | FY2011 | 1D | M | $0.00 | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | M | $83,958.47 | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | FY2010 | 0 | — | $5,998,340.38 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.